The Leadership Team Doesn't Need You to Be Their Equal

By VICKY BROWN

Listen to this episode on

I can usually tell within the first ten minutes of talking to a founder whether their leadership team has a decision problem or a courage problem. Most of them think it’s the first one. It’s almost always the second.

Here’s what I mean. Sit a founder down and sketch out a basic decision framework, who gives input, who recommends, who actually makes the call, who carries it out, and they pick it up fast. It’s not complicated. Most founders could teach it back to you in a single conversation. So if the concept is that easy, why do so many leadership teams still limp along without one? Why does every decision turn into a meeting that could have been an email, and every email turn into a meeting?

It took me a long time to understand what was actually going on. It’s not that founders don’t understand decision rights. It’s that claiming them feels like betraying something. And that something usually goes back further than the leadership team itself.

The formative years can get in the way

Almost every founder I’ve worked with can describe the early version of their company in the same way. A couple of people. A kitchen table. Everyone doing a bit of everything, and every opinion carrying the same weight, because there wasn’t a hierarchy yet, there was just a shared bet and a lot of very late nights. That version of the company gets under your skin. It becomes part of how the founder sees themselves, not just how the business ran. Nobody was above anybody. We built this together. There’s a real sweetness to that season, and I’m not interested in talking anyone out of valuing it.

But companies grow, and structures shift even when the founder’s instincts don’t. The kitchen table turns into a leadership team with actual roles and actual stakes, and the founder is often still running on kitchen table logic. So when the moment comes to say, out loud, this is my decision to make, something in them locks up. Ask why, and you rarely get an honest answer on the first try. You’ll hear I just want everyone to feel heard. Or I don’t want to be that kind of boss. Or I trust my people, I don’t need to control everything. None of that is false, exactly. It’s just not the whole story.

Underneath it is usually a fear that owning a decision will make the founder unlikeable. That it’ll turn them into the boss they swore they’d never become. That the closeness they built with their earliest people will curdle the moment they say, I hear you, and I’m still going a different direction. So the decision just stays open. The meeting runs long. Nobody actually owns the call, and it gets dressed up as collaboration when really it’s avoidance in a much nicer outfit.

“…companies grow, and structures shift even when the founder’s instincts don’t“

The line founders keep missing

Here’s the distinction that tends to land hardest when I bring it up. It feels like the same thing when you’re the one who has to say it out loud. This is my call sounds an awful lot like I’m above you. But it isn’t. Those are two different claims entirely. This is my call isn’t a statement about being better than anyone in the room. It’s a statement about who has to answer for the outcome. That’s it. The founder isn’t saying I matter more. They’re saying I’m the one who has to live with how this turns out, so I need to be the one who decides.

Something changes in a founder once that distinction stops being an idea and becomes something they actually feel. The guilt loosens its grip, because they realize what they were protecting wasn’t their team’s feelings. It was their own discomfort with being visibly, unambiguously in charge.

That’s the piece of this conversation that almost never gets air time. We talk about decision rights like an org chart exercise, who recommends, who decides, who’s accountable for what. But for most founders, the real obstacle was never structural. It was emotional. It was the quiet fear that leading clearly would cost them the relationships that got the company here in the first place.

Why closeness and clarity were never actually in competition

You don’t have to trade being close to your team for being clear with them. Those two things only look like opposites from a distance. Founders who work the hardest to avoid that supposed tradeoff usually end up losing on both fronts. Their team doesn’t feel closer to them, because decisions never firm up. What they feel instead is anxious, because nobody can say with confidence where they stand. And the founder doesn’t get to feel more liked either. Mostly they just feel worn out, hauling around every unresolved decision in their own head because they never let it land anywhere.

Clarity is kindness, plain and simple. Telling your team, this part is your recommendation, but the final call is mine, doesn’t shut anyone out. It hands them solid ground. People do their best work when they know precisely what’s being asked of them. Ambiguity is what quietly wears trust down over time. Clarity doesn’t.

Whether you’re an entrepreneur jumping into a leadership role, a seasoned business pro with new HR responsibilities, or just starting your HR career – we’ve got the right path to guide you through your HR hurdles.

Check out the Leaders Journey Experience.

A small thing to try

If this has been your pattern, try something before your next big decision. Say it out loud, in the room, before the discussion starts, not tucked into a follow up email afterward. Something like, I want everyone’s honest thinking on this, and I’m the one making the final call. Pay attention to what happens next. The conversation usually gets more honest, not less, because your team stops trying to figure out what kind of meeting they’ve wandered into.

Notice, too, how it feels to say it. If it’s uncomfortable, that discomfort isn’t proof you’re getting it wrong. It’s proof you’re finally doing the piece of the job you’ve been sidestepping.

Your leadership team was never asking you to be their equal. They’re asking you to be their leader, and those are two entirely different ways of showing up for the people who bet on you.

Spread the word

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our site.