HR Qs and As

By VICKY BROWN

Listen to this episode on

Instead of focusing on one topic, it seemed like a good idea to do a bit of an HR Q & A.  So, I’ve gathered some of your Qs, and here goes my As.

After one of our former employees left the company, we found out that she used the company card for hundreds of dollars of personal charges.  My CEO is fuming.  Recently the former employee applied to the 401k plan to withdraw her funds so she can roll them over into her new plan.  But my CEO won’t approve releasing the funds with the 401K carrier.  She says, until we get every penny of our money back, she’s not approving anything.  Is that OK?

Alright, while I can certainly understand the frustration and even anger – unfortunately just like you can’t hold someone’s final pay hostage, you can’t hijack their retirement plan money.

All 401Ks are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (or ERISA) – and it’s a federal law that sets minimum standards for almost all retirement, and even some health plans.  The primary job of ERISA is to protect individuals that are in the plan.

It mandates things like requiring notices to participants about plan features and funding.  Setting minimum standards for participation, vesting, the responsibilities of the fiduciary (by the way, if you have a retirement plan, and don’t know who your fiduciary is – it’s probably you.  And you should really look into that).

So, all that to say – ERISA is federal, and it’s not kidding around.  And it also isn’t concerned whether or not your former employee owes you money.  The two issues are completely separate – one is how the retirement funds are managed; and the other is an issue for the court (either small claims or criminal).

So, if you’re tagged with holding on to someone’s retirement account – well, let’s just say Big Trouble is around the corner.  Both the IRS and DOL will be really unhappy with you, and they will make their unhappiness known in the application of penalties and fines.  Honestly – it’s just not worth it.

So, call your attorney, have them write a letter, or even file a police report for theft if you have to – but give Stealing Sally her 401K funds.

Next Q –

My employee came in for his shift, but things were really slow so we sent him home.  We tried to call him while he was on his way, but couldn’t reach him.  Now, after he got his paycheck he’s complaining that he didn’t get paid for that day.  How can he expect to be paid for a day he didn’t work?

California, and 8 other states, have some form of a Reporting Time Pay requirement.  They are all a bit different, but California’s law says that if the employee ends up not work (do to no fault of their own), then they have to be paid.

Now, how much they get paid depends.  They have to get ½ their scheduled shift.  But if ½ of their shift is less than 2 hours – well then they get 2 hours.  And if ½ their shift was more than 4 hours – then they get 4 hours.  And the time the employee actually worked counts – so if they were clocked in for 30 minutes, it’s counted toward the reporting time pay.

Now, there are some bells and whistles around how and if any of this counts as overtime (generally not); so be sure to check the specific law.  But yes, you should go ahead – calculate the Reporting Time Pay you owe Went Home Wally, and pay it to him right away.

…it’s not uncommon for a company to have a policy in intimate relationships in the workplace.  And generally those policies are focused around supervisor / employee relationships and they are there to require that the company be notified that a relationship exists.

Next Q –

I was called into HR recently for a meeting.  During the meeting, my HR rep asked me if I have ever had sex with a colleague.  Can she do that?  That information is so private I don’t want to answer – frankly it’s none of her business.

Well, it sounds like HR is trying to understand if there are possibly any inappropriate relationships happening that impact the workplace.  OK – that’s me trying to give this HR rep some cover.

No – it’s not her business!  And no – you do not have to answer!

Listen, it’s not uncommon for a company to have a policy in intimate relationships in the workplace.  And generally those policies are focused around supervisor / employee relationships and they are there to require that the company be notified that a relationship exists.  It’s a way to protect the person who is junior in the relationship from possible sexual harassment.  And also a way to be sure no undue favors or opportunities are granted.  After all, if both parties are in the same team, one reporting to the other, the company has to look out for the rest of the team as well.

So again, have a policy.  And have a form, so everything is uniform.  And make sure it’s just information that is needed, like when did it start, disclaimers that it is a consenting relationship etc.

But, for HR to come right out and ask if you’re having, or had, sex with someone.  Well, I don’t know about you, but I would say “as that is extremely sensitive and private information – I decline to answer that question.  I understand the notification requirement on intimate relationships, and will be sure to notify you via the appropriate form or memo should the need arise.”

Honestly!

Whether you’re an entrepreneur jumping into a leadership role, a seasoned business pro with new HR responsibilities, or just starting your HR career – we’ve got the right path to guide you through your HR hurdles.

Check out the Leaders Journey Experience.  This online education platform holds the LJE Masterclass, HR SimpleStart Academy and HR FuturePro Academy.

Not sure where to start – take the quiz!

Next Q –

I have an employee who is clearly struggling.  He’s late all the time, has difficulty focusing, forgets things like meetings and client calls, and really just seems dazed some of the time.  He used to be a really great employee, but I think he’s doing drugs.  What should I do, I don’t want to just fire him – but this can’t continue.

Alright, this is one of the stickiest situations to approach.  The main thing is to stay focused on the performance aspect.  Because after all, you just THINK he is doing drugs – all these behaviors could be caused by something completely different – so step carefully.

The first thing to do is have a meeting with him to discuss his performance.  Make it clear that your expectations are this, and his performance is that.  And just ask him – is there any reason he can think of that has caused his performance to fall off so dramatically?

If he says he has a problem and want’s to address it – well then you are obligated to make space for him to go to rehab.  Now, there are lots of caveats with this path – so if you find yourself here, definitely speak with your attorney.

But, if he doesn’t come forward – then you have to deal with it as a strictly performance based issue.  And that unfortunately means corrective action, warnings, and even possible termination.

I know that’s not an easy thing to hear or think about – but remember, you have an obligation to the rest of the team, as their leader.  So buckle up, and do the hard thing.

Spread the word

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our site.